|
Large and high spaces, red brick walls, concrete
floors, steel frame windows, roof lights, gigantic sliding doors,
incomprehensible texts and signs sprayed on
the Avails, traces of machinery, tubes, ducts... all this is the aesthetic of the
abandoned industrial building. After
fust appearing in New York in the
1960s, this aesthetic became the birthplace of the underground - anti-bourgeois,
anti-establishment, marginal, critical, list as punk music showed
you can make music without being able to
play an instrument, so by occupying and living in these buildings it became
clear that you don't in fact need a custom-designed apartment in order live
comfortably. You can live anywhere.
The fact that it has been designed and
used for another purpose gives this kind of space an authenticity
that can hardly be equalled by newly built interiors. An old building has the quality of an objet trouvÎ - its appropriation for another use
transforms the original design of the building into an unconscious and
random act. an almost natural phenomenon.
The new user does not just inhabit a preconceived
space that fits his demands, he is also challenged to adapt his life to the
space and to adapt the space to his life: the space becomes a means of self-identification.
There is
something paradoxical in the way post-Soviet
society is dealing with its architectural heritage. On the one hand,
there is a nostalgia for the old. and on the
other, old buildings are lightly demolished - the nostalgia is very
selective.
Constructivist architecture, wooden houses, but also old factories
tend to be demolished rather then reconstructed. The sensibility for the
aesthetic of abandoned industrial complexes
as described above seems to be underdeveloped, at least in comparison
to Western Europe, where the respect for the cultural value of these complexes has become close to fetishism.
One could say this is the result of the changes of the 1990s primarily being a
bourgeois revolution, whereas the underground culture that
took over post-industrial heritage in the
West was anti-bourgeois. More
important, however, seems to be the fact that the possibility of attaching
historical
value to a building has to do with the question of to what extent society
can perceive the former function of the building as a historical one. In Western
Europe, the process of de-industrialisation started
in the 1970s, and by the 1980s the factory had disappeared from the city centre
and become a historical
phenomenon, at least for the urban middle
class. For Russia the industrial period, artificially prolonged by the Soviet system, only came to
an end a decade ago. and this might still be too close to evoke any feelings of romantic nostalgia.
The Soviet Union was an ideological system that with its prioritization of
production was obliged to the era of
industrialisation. It is no coincidence that the disappearance of Soviet
ideology corresponded with the end of the
industrial era. One could consider
Russia as one enormous old factory that has been vacated because its meaning
(formerly provided by communism) has
been lost: people have stopped producing and are engaged in business, trade, and design. Following the logic of the
beginning of this article, this means that the building stock produced in the Soviet era (i.e. 95 % of the Russian
built environment) has acquired the authenticity of the objet trouvÎ to no less an extent than old factory
buildings in Manhattan in the 1970s. Russia's cultural avant-garde has
understood this a long time ago: Tarkovsky's
Stalker and Nostalgia, the Sots-art of the 1980s and 90s. and the work of the Paper Architects are clear expressions of
this sensibility. It is no coincidence that these works have been
appreciated mostly in the West: the West's attraction
to Russia is directly connected with its love for abandoned industrial complexes.
At the same time, this historical layer could
play an important role in the process of self-identification of Russian architecture and town planning.
The
challenge to the squatter of an industrial building could find its equivalent
in the challenge to architects and
urban designers to inhabit areas abandoned by industry. To erase the historical traces by
demolition would deprive the Russian city of this opportunity.
Bart
Goldhoorn editorial director
CONTENTS
| news |
Alexander Zmeul |
In brief |
| |
Vladimir Frolov |
Apology of the stars |
| |
|
Under the Roof of Home 2006 |
| |
Elena Gonzalez |
Perspective award |
| |
Alexander Lozhkin |
Lost in translation |
| |
Alexei Muratov |
Four exhibitions and one revelation |
| |
Vladimir Frolov |
Zenit is a champion! |
| |
|
Call of the times from Yakov Chernikhov Foundation
|
| |
Alexei Muratov |
Foster's hall |
| |
Anna Kostina |
Milanese Land-art |
| |
Anna Kostina |
Memphis forever |
| |
|
Snaidero Kitchen Centre |
| |
|
NAYADA competition |
| |
|
Conceptual space |
| |
Alexander Matveev |
100% FIDexpo |
| |
Bart Goldhoorn |
Architects and sport: comparison to foreign practice |
| |
Maria Fadeeva |
Russian projects for Norway |
| |
|
Kovcheg Architects - |
| |
|
Residential building on Sadovaya Street in Samara (first stage of construction) |
| |
|
Evgeny Gerasimov and Partners - |
| |
|
Residential building on Staro-Nevsky Prospekt in St Petersburg |
| |
|
Reynberg & Sharov Architects - |
| |
|
Shopping centre on Kazanskaya Street in St Petersburg (Vanity Clothing Store) |
| |
|
|
| conversion |
Bart Goldhoorn |
Editorial: The squatter experience |
| |
Alexander Zmeul, |
|
| |
Alexei Muratov |
Superfluous architecture or Industrial architecture during an age of de-industrialization |
| |
|
|
| impromptu |
|
Valode & Pistre architectes |
| |
|
Naslediye [Heritage] quarter on the premises of Derbenevskaya Calico Printing Factory in Moscow |
| |
|
Sergey Kisselev & Partners |
| |
|
Reorganization of Krasnaya Roza silk weaving factory in Moscow |
| |
|
Mosproekt-4 Business park at Arma Factory |
| |
Maria Fadeeva |
From Red October to Golden Isle |
| |
|
Mosproekt-2 / Jean-Michel Wilmotte & AssociÎs / Koma |
| |
|
Reconstruction of Krasny Oktyabr Factory. Bolotny Island in Moscow |
| |
Ekaterina Lazareva |
The industrialisation of art 102 |
| |
|
Alexander Brodsky Architects |
| |
|
Moscow Wine Factory conversion to the Centre for Contemporary Art |
| |
Vladimir Frolov |
Terra Nova |
| |
|
Erick van Egeraat Associated Architects |
| |
|
Competition proposal for the reconstruction of the New Holland Island in St Petersburg |
| |
|
KSP Engel und Zimmermann Architecten |
| |
|
Competition proposal for the reconstruction of the New Holland Island in St Petersburg |
| |
|
Foster and Partners |
| |
|
Winning design in the competition for the reconstruction of the New Holland Island in St Petersburg |
| |
|
Pastushenko & Samogorov Architectural Bureau Iceberg Shopping Centre, Samara |
| |
Sergei Sitar, Olga Filatova |
The'Factory of the 8th of March': The automation of living and the'return of the repressed' |
| |
|
|
| monitor |
|
AMC Cafe'lnguri' |
| |
|
McAdam Architects Country house in Nikol'skaya Sloboda |
| |
|
SL*project NEXT and POPSA broadcasting studio in Novinsky Arcade |
| |
|
MK-lnterio Architecture office |
| |
|
Vitruvius and Sons Architecture office |
| |
|
|
| texts |
|
A person with intelligent face Round table |
| |
|
|
| |
Bart Goldhoorn |
The Russian market in architecture: myth and reality |
| |
IrinaShipova |
Social housing construction in separated Berlin |
| |
|
|
| technology |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 20c heritage |
Anna Bronovitskaya |
Heritage at Risk |
| |
|
Maristella Casciato: At war one needs a strategy |
| |
Natalia Dushkina |
Towards a new heritage |
| |
Winfried Benne |
Case study: Bauhaus Meisterhouses at Dessau |
| project russia catalogue |
|
|
|