|
When I was living in Moscow for a year in 1993, my stay coincided
with an art project called 'Exchange', which brought together Russian and Dutch
artists to work on art projects - first in Moscow, then in Amsterdam. I remember
wondering about the large apartments of the Russian artists: they were much better
then those of their Dutch counterparts, who were living in small apartments in
squats or other run-down buildings in Amsterdam. It was then I realized that the
picture painted in the West about how repressed were artists in the Soviet Union
was at least one-sided. All too evidently, the social and economic status of artists
was high enough to secure for them 'elite' housing conditions. Later, during my
travels through Russia, I understood that not only did the Soviet Union spend
a lot of money on artists, it did the same with museums. Many museums in the West,
let alone in developing countries, would be jealous of the number of museums in
Russia and the size of their workforces. A telling example is the Museum of Architecture
in Moscow. With its large building and over 100 (!) employees, it must be one
of the largest architecture museums in the world. Nowadays, however, it is questionable
whether this Soviet infrastructure is indeed such a blessing. Everybody knows
that the current state of the buildings and workforce is deplorable: buildings
are falling apart, works of art are rotting in archives and warehouses, and employees'
salaries are insultingly low. There are exceptions, of course. The leading museums,
such as the Tretyakov Gallery, the Pushkin Museum, the Hermitage, and the Russian
Museum, have fewer problems finding money. Some are even developing plans for
renovations and extensions. As we describe in this issue, Rem Koolhaas is involved
in planning the Hermitage's extension and Mikhail Fillippov is designing new interiors
for the Russian Museum. Still, it seems even better not to have a Soviet legacy.
The field of contemporary art evidently profits. There are no buildings needing
renovation, no employees you cannot sack. There is nothing that has to be preserved,
and so contemporary art can develop freely and organize new centres and exhibition
venues such as the Moscow Art Biennale. It is a pity, though, that in their patronage
of architecture the directors and organizers do not demonstrate the ambition they
have shown in displaying Russia's contemporary art. There have been no competitions,
no commissions for young architects, no experiments. It is sad but true: when
it comes to architecture, the Russian art world is no more progressive than the
regular Moscow developer.
Bart Goldhoorn, editor-in-chief
CONTENTS
- Bart Goldhoorn. Editorial
- Round table. What is contemporary museum?
- GREAT HERMITAGE
ОМА/АМО Concept for the reconstruction of the General Staff building
- Bart Goldhoorn. Rem Koolhaas and the Hermitage
RUSSIAN MUSEUM
- Ekaterina Valova. A game of classics
- Yulia Popova. Shadows in Paradise
- Mikhail Filippov et al. Russian Museum reconstruction
- Vladimir Frolov. Competition of ideas
- Mikhail Filippov. Diary of the struggle with Svinkins
- Mikhail Filippov's studio Competition design for the Museum Plaza complex
NCCA
- Elena Gonzalez. The Centre and its branches
- Elena Gonzalez. Projection of the future
- Nizhny Novgorod: project seminar Creating an Arsenal of contemporary art 48
asse architects NCCA branch in Nizhny Novgorod
- Martin Tamke. Perspectives of Kaliningrad
- Kaliningrad: diploma works by students of the Technical University of Braunschweig
54
Mikhail Khazanov's Architecture studio NCCA branch office in Kaliningrad
- Slava Mizin. Milli-Beaubourg (everything included)
- ZAO Kurortproekt - studio No7 The National Centre for Contemporary Art in
Moscow
- Alexei Komov. Lenin Museums: from sarcophagus to sanctuaries
-
GALLERIES
- Alexei Muratov. Art Spaces and Consumption
- asse architects Nashi Khudozhniki Gallery in Borki
- Aleksandr Yakut. Yakut Gallery
- Nikolai Malinin. 8 000 000 square centimetres of art
- Atrium architecture studio RuArts Gallery
MONITOR
|